Cases 31 - 40 of 43
HARTLEY v. CLARK
as 3:2009cv00559
Defendant:
RODNEY CLARK , FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , RANDY TIFFT and others
Plaintiff:
DREW C HARTLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood, et al v. City of Macon, GA, et al
as 5:2000cv00515
Plaintiff:
John E. Wood , James J. Wood , Joe Allen and others
Defendant:
Macon, Georgia , C. Jack Ellis , Melvin Waldrop and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Steve Draper , Wayne Avery , Chris Bartlett and others
Consol_defendant:
Macon, Georgia , Melvin Waldrop , Ben Hubbard and others
Objector:
NAACP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
HARTLEY v. ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv65802
Plaintiff:
BEN C. HARTLEY
Defendant:
ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC., ATLAS ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., INTERNATIONAL TALC MANUFACTURING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARTLEY v. ELLIS
as 3:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
DREW C HARTLEY
Defendant:
D ELLIS, D LEDKINS, JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HARTLEY v. SHAW
as 5:2008cv00244
Plaintiff:
DREW C HARTLEY
Defendant:
K A SHAW
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bryant v. Hartley et al
as 1:2008cv02508
Plaintiff:
Ardest Bryant
Defendant:
William C. Hartley and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Bryant et al
as 1:2007cv22683
Plaintiff:
Drew C. Hartley
Defendant:
Randall Bryant and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARTLEY v. BRYANT
as 5:2007cv00233
Petitioner:
DREW C HARTLEY
Respondent:
RANDALL BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartley v. Warden of Florida State Prison et al
as 1:2007cv21731
Plaintiff:
Drew C. Hartley
Defendant:
Warden of Florida State Prison, Warden of Florida State Prison and Attorney General of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
