Cases 31 - 40 of 43
KILGORE v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2012cv00094
Defendant:
ADMIN. BEIGHLEY, WARDEN CHURCH, C.O. ESTEP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. KILGORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDULLAH v. BATES et al
as 2:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
MUTTAQIN FATIR ABDULLAH
Defendant:
MRS. BATES, LT. CROOKS, C.O. HARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BUTLER v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
STACY L. BUTLER
Defendant:
C.O. M. DIEODORFF, LT. HOWARD, LT. B. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RIVERA v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2011cv00142
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, ASST. WARDEN CHURCH, OFFICER COX and others
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCARTER v. PARKER et al
as 2:2011cv00100
Defendant:
J. ALLEN, LT. S. BRACE, J. EDWARD and others
Plaintiff:
ZEVON McCARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIDD v. BLANKENSHIP et al
as 4:2011cv00022
Defendant:
JUDGE SALLY A. BLANKENSHIP, C.O. AT DEARBORN COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, CORP GUY GRAMAGLIA and others
Plaintiff:
NORBERT PATRICK KIDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2011cv00040
Defendant:
LT. BRACE, C.O. HARLOW, C.O. HORN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2011cv00026
Defendant:
LT. BRACE, C.O. HARLOW, C.O. HORN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCARTER v. PARKER et al
as 2:2011cv00016
Defendant:
LT. BRUCE, B. ENGLISH, MORIN and others
Plaintiff:
ZEVON McCARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BUTLER v. FEDERAL B.O.P. et al
as 1:2010cv01568
Plaintiff:
STACY L. BUTLER
Defendant:
C.O. M. DIEODORFF, FEDERAL B.O.P., L.T. HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
