Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Clayton v. Moseley et al
as 8:2016cv01363
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Clayton, Jr
Defendant:
James Mosely, Lamaz Robinson, B J Herlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherbert v. KJR Trucking et al
as 7:2016cv00705
Plaintiff:
Ruth M Sherbert
Defendant:
KJR Trucking , Michael Len Carpenter and Karina Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv04900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carpenter v. Bragg et al
as 8:2015cv00574
Plaintiff:
Colin Carpenter
Defendant:
M Travis Bragg, William Dunbar, Millard Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Adamian et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02354
Plaintiff:
Mary Adamian , Linda Baraz , Soraya Azad and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Park Place Corporation v. Carpenter Company et al
as 6:2013cv02085
Plaintiff:
Park Place Corporation
Defendant:
Carpenter Company, E.R. Carpenter LP, Carpenter Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
American Bedding Company Inc et al v. Carpenter Company et al
as 6:2013cv02084
Plaintiff:
American Bedding Company Inc , Diamond Mattress Company and Rest Master Bedding Company
Defendant:
Carpenter Company, E.R. Carpenter LP, Carpenter Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2013cv02024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
