Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Johansen v. City of Kent et al
as 2:2016cv00416
Defendant:
Officer A.J. Cox and City of Kent
Plaintiff:
Bradley Johansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glimberg et al v. City of Auburn et al
as 2:2015cv01282
Defendant:
City of Auburn , City of Federal Way , City of Kent and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Glimberg and Sarah Glimberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Triplett v. City of Kent et al
as 2:2015cv01238
Plaintiff:
David Triplett
Defendant:
City of Kent, Stewart Beall and MacNichols Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Torre v. City of Renton et al
as 2:2014cv01779
Plaintiff:
Melinda De La Torre
Defendant:
City of Renton , Robert Onishi , Jason Solema and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Austin v. City of Kent et al
as 2:2014cv01539
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Austin
Defendant:
City of Kent , Doug Westcott , Lyndon Baron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rikansrud v. City of Kent, et al
as 2:2014cv01279
Defendant:
City of Kent , Kent City Jail , John & Jane Doe Health Treaters and others
Plaintiff:
Frank L Rikansrud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zahn et al v. Kent et al
as 2:2014cv01065
Plaintiff:
Estate of Clayton Roy Zahn , Kezawin Boyd and Bette Jean Manning
Defendant:
City of Kent and Jason Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: New Cingular Wireless, PCS, LLC Data Services Sales Tax Refund Litigation
as 2:2013md02485
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
City of Renton Washington , City of Tukwila, Washington , City of Kent, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City of Kent, Washington
as WAW/2:13-cv-01290
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
City of Kent, Washington
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City of Kent, Washington
as 2:2013cv01290
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
City of Kent, Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
