Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00226
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Clark County Sheriff et al
as 2:2011cv00220
Defendant:
Clark County Sheriff, Doug Gillispie, S. Guammas and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Sheriff et al
as 2:2009cv00808
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hairston
Defendant:
Clark County Sheriff, Douglas Gillispie, Saragosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calhoun v. Roger et al
as 2:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
Myron B. Calhoun
Defendant:
David Roger, Mary K. Holtus, Clark County Prosecutor Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cox v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 3:2007cv00470
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. Cox
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Clark County Sheriff Department, University Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Springs v. Clark County Sheriff
as 2:2007cv01476
Plaintiff:
Michael Springs
Defendant:
Clark County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reising v. Clark County Sheriff
as 2:2007cv01322
Plaintiff:
James Reising
Defendant:
Clark County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowell v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2007cv01055
Plaintiff:
Lamarr Rowell
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Clark County Sheriff and Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. Clark County Sheriff
as 2:2007cv01412
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carrillo
Defendant:
Clark County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2007cv01196
Plaintiff:
William Clark
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Close, Forbus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
