Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Asure et al
as 3:2014cv01538
Plaintiff:
Kevin Combs
Defendant:
Donna Asure, David Kessling, Richard Cuth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAI v. RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02546
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MAI
Defendant:
RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , ERIC APONTE and others
Cross_claimant:
ERIC APONTE
Cross_defendant:
ERIC APONTE , DONNA COMBS, ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COMBS v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
MISTY COMBS
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. COMBS
as 2:2013cv02655
Plaintiff:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ZOE T. COMBS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
COMBS v. TRIPP et al
as 2:2013cv02299
Petitioner:
JACK COMBS
Respondent:
TRIPP and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COMBS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv05336
Petitioner:
JACK COMBS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
COMBS v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60095
Plaintiff:
GILBERT COMBS
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Samuel et al
as 3:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Smith
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuel, Jr., FCI Allenwood, FCI Elkton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
