Cases 31 - 40 of 506
(PC) Armenta v. Gipson et al
as 2:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Johnson, Trenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lamon v. CDCR et al
as 2:2022cv00703
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Howard E. Moseley, Robert Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jace v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Michael Jace
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Kathleen Allison, Tammy Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2022cv00550
Petitioner:
Antonio Muro
Respondent:
Connie Gipson and Rob Bonto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ciron B. Springfield v. Kathleen Allision et al
as 2:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Ciron B. Springfield
Defendant:
Kathleen Allision, Cherri Pham, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry C. Navarro v. James Hill
as 5:2022cv00285
Petitioner:
Henry C. Navarro
Respondent:
Connie Gipson and James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Smith v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 22-15069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY BERNARD SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, JIM ROBERTSON, M. HODGES and others
Nguon v. Glynn et al
as 3:2021cv02113
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Mary Anne Glynn, Steven Roberts, John Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Michel v. Gipson et al
as 1:2021cv01678
Plaintiff:
Fabian Hancy Michel
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Howard E. Moseley, B. Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Michel v. Gipson et al
as 2:2021cv02178
Plaintiff:
Fabian Hancy Michel
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Howard E. Moseley, B. Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
