Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Tucker et al v. Bechtel National, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00557
Plaintiff:
Robin Tucker, All Plaintiffs, Lydia Tarleton and others
Defendant:
Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc., Flour Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Evans v. Smith
as 1:2009cv00418
Plaintiff:
Raymond Curtis Evans
Defendant:
D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Rios, et al
as 7:2008cv00149
Plaintiff:
Raymond Curtis Evans
Defendant:
H. Rios, Jr. and USP - Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Evans v. Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2008cv00739
Plaintiff:
Raymond Curtis Evans
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center, J Giles and Mayberry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans v. Smith
as 1:2008cv00671
Petitioner:
Raymond Curtis Evans
Respondent:
D. Smith, D. Smith and D. Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Raymond Evans v. D. Smith
as 08-5081
Petitioner - Appellant:
Raymond Curtis Evans
Respondent - Appellee:
D. Smith, Warden
Olakunle Oshodi v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-71478
Petitioner:
OLAKUNLE OSHODI, AKA Bode Okeowo, AKA Olakunle Akintola Oshodi, AKA Olakunle Akintola Akinba Oshodi, AKA Isaac Oliver Alger, AKA Curtis Evans, AKA Bode Olacune Okeowo, AKA Isaac Okeowo
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
EVANS v. SMITH
as 1:2008cv00372
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CURTIS EVANS
Defendant:
D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. Walker et al
as 2:2007cv02186
Plaintiff:
Curtis Evans
Defendant:
Rodger E Walker, Jr, Daniel Walsh, . Nancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
