Cases 31 - 40 of 200
Her Imports v. Cabello Real Ltd et al
as 1:2022cv03243
Plaintiff:
Her Imports
Defendant:
Cabello Real Ltd and Cabello Real FZE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv02715
Plaintiff:
Her Imports and Unknown
Defendant:
Cabello Real, Ltd. and Cabello Real FZE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
USA v. Cabello
as 22-50252
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alfonso Cabello
Torres Cabello v. New York State Urban Development Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv02645
Plaintiff:
Edison Daniel Torres Cabello
Defendant:
New York State Urban Development Corporation, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Long Island Railroad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Cabello v. VanBlarcum et al
as 1:2022cv00684
Plaintiff:
Manuel Cabello
Defendant:
David VanBlarcum and Steve Sharp Crane & Rigging LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cabello-Camarillo et al v. Buchheit Trucking Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Rosario Cabello-Camarillo and M.A.C, Minor
Defendant:
Buchheit Trucking Service, Inc., Michael Scott French and Estate of Jesus Tapia, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nicks v. Cabello, et al
as 3:2021cv00716
Defendant:
John Terry Nicks, Daniel Reyna Cabello, Select Dedicated Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cabello v. USA
as 21-51066
Petitioner / Appellant:
Archie Cabello
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Cabello v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00242
Petitioner:
Archie Cabello
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
