Cases 31 - 40 of 56
IN RE: SEAN FARRIS AND FARRIS LAW
as 1:2013mc00183
Movant:
SEAN FARRIS and FARRIS LAW
Respondent:
CAROLE SWAN
SYLVESTER v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
CAROL SYLVESTER
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MURPHY v. MAINE, STATE OF
as 2:2012cv00372
Petitioner:
CAROL MURPHY
Respondent:
MAINE, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. CORIZON et al
as 1:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
CORIZON, RICH HALLWORTH, KEN TOPEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RUFFIN v. COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ONEIL RUFFIN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , SCOTT JONES and CAROL GEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACDOUGALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2010cv00400
Plaintiff:
CAROL MACDOUGALL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PALESKY v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2010cv00270
Plaintiff:
CAROL PALESKY
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CONSUMER ADVISORY, et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSIONER, et al
as 2:1991cv00321
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER ADVISORY BOARD , AMELIA DOE , MARY B DOE and others
Defendant:
DESHAIES, ROGER , HARTLEY, DONALD and MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
CORSE v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC et al
as 1:2009cv00638
Plaintiff:
CAROL CORSE
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC and ALTRIA GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
