Cases 31 - 40 of 2,118
WALDEN v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WALDEN
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Wheeler Walker v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lavon Wheeler Walker
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Wade Damron and Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wheeler v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lavon Wheeler
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Christopher Carr and Wade Damron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Director Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Ronald Brawner
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McElrath v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Damian Cornell McElrath
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Cobb County - GA, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
