Cases 31 - 40 of 107
BUSH v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01004
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
PRESTINE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03625
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
TAYLOR v. COMCAST'S CORPORATION EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS et al
as 2:2018cv01230
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. TAYLOR
Defendant:
COMCAST'S JOHN DOE, PAY AGENCIES, CHRISTINA D., MATTHEW F. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation et al
as 2:2018mc00129
Plaintiff:
PROMPTU SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
TORRES v. COMCAST CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv00276
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL TORRES
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Srvs. Employment & Reemployment Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LEWIS v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv02692
Plaintiff:
LARNICE LEWIS
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION and COMMUNICATIONS UNLIMITED, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PROMPTU SYSTEMS CORPORATION v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv06516
Plaintiff:
PROMPTU SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
