Cases 31 - 40 of 111
C. REGAN ET. AL et al v. CONWAY
as 2:2018cv09440
Plaintiff:
C. REGAN ET. AL, AUTOCLEAR, LLC and HAZIM AUDALLA
Defendant:
BRAD CONWAY
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
REGAN et al v. CONWAY et al
as 2:2018cv02104
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REGAN , DAVID BONDY , TODD CONWAY and others
Defendant:
BRAD CONWAY and HAZIM AUDALLA
Intervenor:
CONTROL SCREENING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12974
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SONDRINI v. CONWAY et al
as 1:2017cv07972
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SONDRINI
Defendant:
CHARLES CONWAY, JENNIFER CONWAY and AC&K IRRIGATION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv07435
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv07178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
EDWARDS v. MTGLQ INVESTORS L.P. et al
as 2:2017cv06630
Plaintiff:
SONJA EDWARDS
Defendant:
MTGLQ INVESTORS L.P., NATION STAR MORTGAGE LLC, SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03747
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CONWAY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2016cv09550
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CONWAY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROOVER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv09428
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOSEPH GROOVER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, STEPHEN PRATT, BRYAN CONWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
