Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Vargas v. Corizon Medical Provider et al
as 2:2016cv01666
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Shaun Vargas
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Provider, Charles L Ryan, Greg Fizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas #058263 v. Corizon Medical et al
as 2:2016cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Douglas
Defendant:
Corizon Medical and Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Triplett v. Godfrey et al
as 3:2016cv08009
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ernest Triplett
Defendant:
Thomas K Godfrey, Correct Care Solutions Medical, Corizon Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amin-Sobhani v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00577
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Amin-Sobhani
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Corizon Medical and Wexford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diego v. Hegmann et al
as 2:2015cv02381
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Mendez Diego
Defendant:
Michael Hegmann, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01488
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kelly
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Medical Corporation, Christine Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #208134 v. Babeu et al
as 2:2015cv01391
Plaintiff:
Raymond Russell Williams
Defendant:
Paul R Babeu, Brenda Mastyk, Craig A Raymond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pilgrim v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Pilgrim
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Corizon Medical and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisenall #157093 v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2015cv00981
Plaintiff:
George Wayne Chisenall
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Unknown Priest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Ferguson
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Unknown Rankin, N Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
