Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Coughlin v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01045
Plaintiff:
Sharon Coughlin
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America et al v. Coughlin
as 2:2009mc00021
Petitioner:
United States of America and Alex Alarcon
Respondent:
Cynthia A. Coughlin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Couglin v. California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.,
as 2:2008cv02772
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Coughlin
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Tom Maugeri
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Couglin v. California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.,
as 2:2008at01376
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Coughlin
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Tom Maugeri
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dismuke v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2008cv02444
Plaintiff:
Melvin Dismuke
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, J Coughlin, S Palomares and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coughlin v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 8:2008cv00015
Plaintiff:
Tracy Coughlin and Tracy Coughlin
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Sears, Roebuck and Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Robert Thiel et al v. Buchman et al
as 2:2007cv04469
Plaintiff:
Robert Thiel, Joyce Thiel and D. T.
Defendant:
Mark Buchman, David Cementia, Fran Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yusty et al v. Tut Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2001cv02659
Plaintiff:
Carlos Horacio Yusty , Andres Jaramillo and Rodrigo Jaramillo
Defendant:
Tut Systems, Inc. , Salvatore D'Auria , Nelson Caldwell and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Charles Lefkowitz , William Huelsman , Carolina Streicher and others
Movant:
Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP and Bruce G. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
