Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Lee E. Knowles v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2012cv02284
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., Amtrol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce Knowles and Lee E. Knowles
SCHWAB v. GOODRICH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv60000
Cross Defendant:
INDUCTOTHERM CORP., EDWARD R. HART COMPANY, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
MCNEIL & NRM INC., EXXON MOBILE CORPORATION, SHELDON-DRULLARD REALTY CORP. and others
Counter Defendant:
J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO., M.F. MURDOCK COMPANY, VIACOM, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
OAKFABCO, INC.
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SCHWAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PETERS v. GOODRICH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv60001
Defendant:
CRANE COMPANY, THE MARMON GROUP, INC., MCNEIL & NRM INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DELORES PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAZELTON v. GOODRICH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv60002
Counter Defendant:
THE MARMON GROUP, INC., BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
ROCKBESTOS COMPANY, THEIM CORPORATION, ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC. and others
Defendant:
MCNEIL & NRM INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC. and ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
BERNICE BRAZELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SCHWAB v. GOODRICH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv06000
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SCHWAB
Defendant:
GOODRICH CORPORATION , GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. , FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronald Seguine et al v. Ajax Boiler Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10316
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps Inc:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Defendant:
Ajax Boiler Inc, Armstrong International Inc, Burnham LLC and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chief Auto Part:
Autozone West Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Borg-Warner Corporation:
Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Kragen Auto Supply Co:
CSK Auto Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Cochrane Corporation:
Crane Environmental Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company:
Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Cutler-Hammer Inc:
Eaton Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu:
FMC Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Bendix Corporation:
Honeywell International Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor In Interest To DelavalTurbine Inc:
IMO Industries Inc
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To York International:
Johnson Controls Inc
Individually And As Successor In Interest To Kewanee Boiler Corporation:
Oakfabco Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Abex Corporation:
Pneumo Abex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Seguine and Ronald Seguine
As Successor-in-interest To Titusville Forge Company:
Struthers Wells Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries Inc And Successor To Erie City Iron Wor:
Zurn Industries LLC
Filing Error
as 1:2011cv02646
Plaintiff:
Scott Schwab
Defendant:
Goodrich Corporation, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Goodrich Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv10001
Plaintiff:
Delores Peters
Defendant:
Goodrich Corporation , Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company , Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filing Error
as 1:2011cv02648
Plaintiff:
Delores Peters
Defendant:
Goodrich Corporation, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schwab, etc. v. Goodrich Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv10000
Plaintiff:
Scott Schwab
Defendant:
Goodrich Corporation , Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. , Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
