Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Thornton v. Cromwell
as 1:2022cv00469
Petitioner:
Ander L Thornton and Andre L Thornton
Respondent:
Daniel Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willms v. Redgranite Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Chad James Willms
Defendant:
Redgranite Correctional Institution, Eric Barber, Warden Daniel Cromwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cursey v. Cromwell et al
as 2:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Cursey
Defendant:
Dan Cromwell, Matthew Emberton, Brian Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Hall et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Gonzalez
Defendant:
Tracy Hall, Dan Cromwell and John Congdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stallings v. Cromwell
as 2:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
Tyrone Stallings
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Cromwell et al
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Dan Cromwell, Capt Hoch, Toney Emil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Cromwell et al
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Dan Cromwell, Kevin Carr, Capt Hoch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earsley v. Meisner et al
as 2:2021cv01015
Plaintiff:
Steven Earsley
Defendant:
Warden Meisner, Deputy Warden Barber, Security Director McHugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Cromwell
as 2:2021cv00991
Petitioner:
John D Carter
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blake, Thomas v. Willard-West, Kelli et al
as 3:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Blake
Defendant:
Kelli Willard-West, Michael Donovan, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
