Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Jackson v. State of Ohio
as 1:2011cv01715
Plaintiff:
Clifford D Jackson, III
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Doe
as 1:2011cv01624
Plaintiff:
Clifford D Jackson, III
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. DePuy Orthapedics Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21413
Defendant:
DePuy Orthapedics Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Joan D. Jackson and Robert W. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drake et al v. Howland et al
as 2:2009cv00824
Plaintiff:
William Drake, William Drake, William Drake and others
Defendant:
Charles S Howland, - Morrow County, Rodney K Clinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Filing Error
as 4:2009cv00752
Plaintiff:
Home Savings and Loan Company of Youngstown, Ohio
Defendant:
Jak Capital LLC, Jimmy D. Jackson and Kenya M Jackson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Home Savings & Loan Company of Youngstown, Ohio v. JAK Capital, LLC et al
as 4:2009cv00754
Plaintiff:
Home Savings and Loan Company of Youngstown, Ohio and Home Savings and Loan Company of Youngstown, Ohio
Defendant:
JAK Capital, LLC, Jimmy D. Jackson and Kenya M Jackson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jackson v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2008cv00106
Plaintiff:
Wendell D Jackson
Defendant:
City of Columbus, City of Columbus, Gary Mathias and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MSI Regency Ltd. v. Jackson et al
as 1:2007cv00900
Plaintiff:
MSI Regency Ltd.
Defendant:
Alvin D. Jackson, J Nick Baird, Christine A. Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
