Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Muhammad v. New York City et al
as 1:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Prince D.M. Muhammad
Defendant:
New York City and John Gleeson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. New York City et al
as 1:2015cv05102
Petitioner:
Prince D.M. Muhammad
Respondent:
New York City, Mary Bassett and Vincent Miccoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad v. New York City et al
as 1:2015cv03401
Defendant:
Warden Edmund Duffy, Warden Gumusdere and New York City
Plaintiff:
Mr. Prince D.M. Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D.M.1 et al v. New York City Department of Education et al
as 1:2015cv03359
Plaintiff:
D.M.1
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education and Carmen Farina
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
D.M. et al v. City School District of the City of New York
as 1:2015cv01619
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
City School District of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
D.M. Rothman Co., Inc. et al v. Marchella LLC et al
as 1:2014cv03475
Plaintiff:
D.M. Rothman Co., Inc. and Coosemans New York, Inc.
Defendant:
Marchella LLC and Mark Aronbayev
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
D.M. Rothman Co. Inc. et al v. Produce Express Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03457
Plaintiff:
D.M. Rothman Co. Inc. , Fitz & Pal Food Center LLC and Coosemans New York Inc.
Defendant:
Produce Express Inc., Colossal Fruit & Vegetable Inc., George Scheinberg and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Jones v. Avanzato et al
as 1:2014cv02044
Plaintiff:
Glynn Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Avanzato, Supple, Hasen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. The New York State et al
as 1:2013cv08116
Plaintiff:
Prince D.M. Muhammad
Defendant:
The New York State, Vincent Miccoli, Richard Miraglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.M. Rothman & Co., Inc. v. Stratis
as 1:2013cv06932
Plaintiff:
D.M. Rothman & Co., Inc.
Defendant:
John Stratis
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
