Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Beanland, Mark et al v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00967
Plaintiff:
Brad Solberg, Gary Connell, Andrew Cottrill and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Spence v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2019cv01280
Plaintiff:
Gregory Spence
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan and Debbie Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv03240
Plaintiff:
Charles W Armour
Defendant:
Tracy Cheatham, Daniel Sullivan, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spence v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2019cv00991
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services Inc., Tad Van Dyke, Daniel Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv06042
Plaintiff:
Charles W Armour
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan, Illinois Department of Corrections (I.D.O.C.), John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irving v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2019cv00557
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan, Hummerhouse, Morgenthaler and others
Plaintiff:
Keith R. Irving
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colin v. Gerst et al
as 3:2019cv00494
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Colin
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan, Mr. Gerst, Dennis Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannady v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2019cv01656
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Petitioner:
Fuzzell A. Cannady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OC Kickboxing and Mixed Martial Arts, Inc. v. Warrior Arts Alliance, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00004
Defendant:
Warrior Arts Alliance, Inc., Daniel Sullivan and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
OC Kickboxing and Mixed Martial Arts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Adams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11493
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cruciata, Timothy Branan, John Scanlon and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
