Cases 31 - 40 of 242
GARCIA v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2021cv05200
Plaintiff:
LUIS GARCIA
Defendant:
OFFICER JEFFREY ROBINSON and JOHN DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NESMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv04700
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE S NESMITH
Defendant:
AMARA S AHMED, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NESMITH S MARQUELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
ROUNDTREE v. SANTIAGO et al
as 1:2020cv20744
Defendant:
OFC. STADE, OFC. CRANEY, OFC. MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BALLY HOTEL AND CASINO et al
as 1:2020cv17773
Defendant:
JOHN DOES PARTNERSHIPS 1-10, JOHN DOES PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 1-3, BALLY ATLANTIC CITY doing business as BALLY'S ATLANTIC CITY HOTEL & CASINO and others
Plaintiff:
CHERLISA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRAPP v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv10404
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE BANK, JOHN DOE 1-3, DENNIS O'BRIEN and others
Plaintiff:
DENARD C. TRAPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIRZA, M.D. et al v. JOHN DOES #1-3
as 2:2020cv05975
Defendant:
DOES #1-3 JOHN
Plaintiff:
DR. MUHAMMAD MIRZA, M.D. and ALLIED MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANDRIS v. BEYOND DISTRIBUTION, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03385
Plaintiff:
CLAIRE ANDRIS
Defendant:
BEYOND DISTRIBUTION, INC., SYLVANUS O. HAYNES, XYZ CORP. 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MICHAEL et al v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., et al
as 2:2020cv01853
Defendant:
MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., MACY'S INC., DIVERSIFIED MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NAGAT MICHAEL and WAGEEH Y. MICHAEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
