Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Cullum v. Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2011cv04416
Plaintiff:
Detrick Deshun Cullum
Defendant:
Cook County Illinois, Sheriff Darcy, Sheriff Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobbs v. Tucker et al
as 1:2011cv02522
Plaintiff:
Terrell Cobbs
Defendant:
Earl Tucker, Ms Reed and Captain Darcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leite v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv10786
Plaintiff:
Darcy-Lynne Leite
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00648
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bell
Defendant:
Andrew J Morgan , Wendell E Wright , R.M. Crotty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keri Griesbach et al v Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv20003
Plaintiff:
Keri Griesbach, Alina Jimenez, Leslie Maldonado and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Holliman v. Benton et al
as 3:2010cv03116
Plaintiff:
Marquis Holliman
Defendant:
Sherri Benton, Deborah, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holliman v. Benton et al
as 3:2010cv50081
Plaintiff:
Marquis Holliman
Defendant:
Sherri Benton, Deborah, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00719
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Sharples v. Anderson et al
as 1:2009cv05124
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Sharples
Defendant:
Sup. Anderson, Cpt. Darcy, Sgt. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eggert v. Gallardo et al
as 1:2009cv02275
Plaintiff:
Darcy Eggert, Darcy Eggert, Darcy Eggert and others
Defendant:
E. Gallardo, Jr. and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
