Cases 31 - 40 of 117
BAILEY v. MCLEMORE et al
as 1:2017cv00154
Defendant:
JANE DOE, BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA, SOUTHEAST CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL GROUP LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Bailey et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Rick Gibson
Defendant:
David R. Bailey and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Markussen v. Bernard Warner, et al
as 17-35167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK MARKUSSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD EDWARD WARNER, Secretary of DOC, JEFFERY UTTECHT, Superintendant, DAVID P. BAILEY, Associate Superintendant and others
USA v. David Bailey
as 16-10543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID C. BAILEY
USA v. David Bailey
as 16-10544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID C. BAILEY
Bailey v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bailey
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Randy Ingram, John Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bailey v. Randy Ingram
as 16-6707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY INGRAM, in his individual capacity, et al.
David Bailey v. Randy Ingram
as 16-6390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY INGRAM, in his individual capacity, et al.
Bailey v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00343
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bailey
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Randy Ingram, John Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Silva v. Jeffrey Uttecht, et al
as 16-35683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW G. SILVA
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden, DAVID P. BAILEY, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center Associate Superintendent, SCANLON, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center Hearings Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
