Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 65
SCOTT v. LIEBEL
as 2:2021cv00144
Defendant: DAVID LIEBEL
Plaintiff: CHANNING LAMONT SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. CARTER et al
as 2:2020cv00348
Plaintiff: JOSHUA WAYNE MURPHY and HAMZEH WALI ABU JIHAD
Defendant: M. LINCOLN, B. SMITH, DAVID LIEBEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERSON v. DRADA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00277
Defendant: BANTA, DAVID LIEBEL, DANIEL BEDWELL and others
Plaintiff: RUBEN REUAD PIERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEIRSON v. DRADA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00231
Defendant: BANTA, DAVID LIEBEL, DANIEL BEDWELL and others
Plaintiff: RUBEN REUAD PEIRSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Liebel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00327
Defendant: David Liebel
Plaintiff: James M Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LACEY v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00181
Defendant: RICHARD BROWN, TIMOTHY TANNER, KEVIN GILMORE and others
Plaintiff: JOHN JAY LACEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LACEY v. BROWN et al
as 1:2019cv04123
Defendant: DAVID LIEBEL, RICHARD BROWN and DAVID WALKER
Plaintiff: JOHN JAY LACEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WATKINS v. COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2019cv04081
Defendant: COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and DAVID LIEBEL
Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP v. LIEBEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01990
Plaintiff: JAMES M. SHARP
Defendant: DAVID LIEBEL, STANLEY KNIGHT, JEREMY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Carter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00161
Defendant: Ron Neal, Terry Harmon, Robert J Carter and others
Undetermined: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff: Joe Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?