Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Eugene Jones-El v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 10-2320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Stewart Epps and others
Blakey v. Dormire et al
as 2:2010cv04082
Plaintiff:
Jackie Dewayne Blakey
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Arthur Woods, Jay Cassidy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Jones-El v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 10-1316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Kenneth Jones and Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Stewart Epps and others
Jones-El v. Dormire et al
as 2:2009cv04255
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Billy Galloway, Stewart Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Irving v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 09-1157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William E. Irving
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Campbell, Previously named as Cambell, Captain-JCCC, Daniel Kempker, Functional Unit Manager- JCCC and others
Timothy Jacobs v. David Dormire, et al
as 08-3666
Petitioner - Appellant:
Timothy Jacobs
Respondent - Appellee:
David Dormire, Authur Wood, Charles Turner and others
Jacobs v. Dormire et al
as 4:2007cv00897
Petitioner:
Timothy Jacobs
Respondent:
David Dormire, Arthur Wood, Charles Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skinner v. Corser et al
as 2:2007cv04162
Plaintiff:
John C. Skinner
Defendant:
Richard G. Corser, Debra Reed, Carl - Dedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner et al v. Reed et al
as 2:2007cv04160
Plaintiff:
John C. Skinner
Defendant:
Debra Reed and Curtis Whittle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Dormire et al
as 2:2007cv04107
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lewis
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Walter Friesen, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
