Cases 31 - 40 of 507
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024at99906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff
Defendant:
Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024at99908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff
Defendant:
Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024at99911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff
Defendant:
Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024at99912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff
Defendant:
Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at99906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff
Defendant:
Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024ph99903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff
Defendant:
Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024ph99901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff
Defendant:
Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024ph99911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff
Defendant:
Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Foley v. Pima County Public Defender's Office et al
as 4:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Matthew V Foley, Jr.
Defendant:
Pima County Public Defender's Office, Kurt E Mosley, Sean Stuart Coulter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kauffman #360639 v. Arizona State Prison Complex Eyman Rynning Unit et al
as 2:2023cv01278
Plaintiff:
Zion Z Kauffman
Defendant:
Arizona State Prison Complex Eyman Rynning Unit, Arizona State Prison Complex Eyman SMU Unit, Mohave County Adult Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
