Cases 31 - 40 of 40
YOUNG v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2020cv01356
Respondent:
DEREK OBERLANDER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCALE v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2019cv05443
Respondent:
DEREK OBERLANDER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHIL
Petitioner:
TYREK SCALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEDBY v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2019cv05241
Respondent:
DEREK OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
KEVIN NEDBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILAS v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00313
Defendant:
CERT. OFF. JAMES, RAYMOND BURKEHART, DERINA VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MILAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Cunningham v. Oberlander et al
as 3:2019cv01425
Respondent:
Derek Oberlander and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Petitioner:
Brian Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SELDON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00090
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE SELDON
Defendant:
DR. SUTHERLAND, JOHN DOE LEE, ROBERT MAXA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RAMBERT v. WETZEL, et al
as 1:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SHEILA MOORE-SMEAL, RENEE FOULDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSTON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
NORMAN JOHNSTON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUESES v. HAYS et al
as 1:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
KENNY MUESES
Defendant:
CINDY HAYS, KEVIN DITTMAN, DEREK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCAIN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, STEVEN GATES, TAMMY CERSARINO-MARTIN, MAJOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
