Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02247
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00847
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Skurdal v. Federal Detention Center
as 2:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Gustav Skurdal
Defendant:
Federal Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vianez v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2012cv05272
Plaintiff:
Juan Alexander Vianez
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Federal Detention Center Sea-Tac, Western State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv05146
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mekhaeil et al v. North Las Vegas Detention Center
as 2:2010cv01054
Plaintiff:
Shaady Mekhaeil
Defendant:
North Las Vegas Detention Center and J. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winslow v. Feather et al
as 2:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Ted L Winslow
Defendant:
Marion Feather, M. Aslam and Federal Detention Center Seatac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Talton Telecommunication et al
as 3:2009cv05706
Plaintiff:
Cotoc Jose Sanchez
Defendant:
Talton Telecommunication, Northwest Detention Center and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. King County Adult & Juvenile Detention Center et al
as 2:2009cv01484
Petitioner:
Kevin V. Jones
Respondent:
King County Adult & Juvenile Detention Center, Dow Constantine and King County Jail Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
