Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Hatmaker et al v. Rockcastle County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Nathan Carter, Rockcastle County, Kentucky, Suzanne Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Downs and Tristan Winstead
Executor:
Lucy Hatmaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Mayes v. Farmer et al
as 5:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Sergeant Jeremy Abney and Director Lisa Farmer
Plaintiff:
Keith Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Louisville Metro Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Broderick Brooks
Defendant:
Deputy Director Martin Baker and Louisville Metro Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. Farmer et al
as 5:2020cv00513
Defendant:
Officer Norris, Major Morganson, Judge Van Meter and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mobley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Unknown Michigan State Trooper et al
as 5:2021cv00009
Defendant:
J. Russell, Caleb Brill, W. Powers and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Durrell Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Champagne v. Haney et al
as 5:2020cv00494
Defendant:
Commissioner Cookie Crews, Director Steve Haney and Corrections Officer Byson Brown
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Champagne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. Farmer et al
as 5:2020cv00489
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
Fayette Co. Detention Center and Director Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parsley v. Director Farmer et al
as 5:2020cv00515
Defendant:
Fayette County Detention Center Administration, Director Farmer, Fayette County Detention Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Parsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. LFUGC-Division of Community Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00001
Plaintiff:
Alan Gay
Defendant:
Major Morganson, Captain Lemonds, LFUGC-Division of Community Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
