Cases 31 - 40 of 2,777
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11094
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11086
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11095
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Yourglich v. Pension Benefit Information LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv11004
Plaintiff:
Brad Yourglich
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlblom v. Pension Benefit Information LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11006
Plaintiff:
Sean Carlblom
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pope v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv10980
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jabir Pope
Defendant:
City of Boston, Peter J. O'Malley, James T. Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv30054
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Steven Tatro, Anthony Pioggia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gould et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 3:2024cv30033
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elliot Gould and Jonathan Chad Brown
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Jonathan Kane, Maria C. Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
