Cases 31 - 40 of 41
USA v. Dorothy Robinson
as 12-2614
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DOROTHY ROBINSON, a/k/a Mae-Mae, a/k/a Dorothy Johnson
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2012cv01011
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dorothy Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al.
as 1:2011cv06856
Plaintiff:
Gilliard David Robinson and Dorothy Robinson
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank and Fisher and Shapiro, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2011cv01765
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dorothy Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv03183
Plaintiff:
Jahbari Jones
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Dorothy Robinson, Patrick H. Head and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Robinson et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2010cv13241
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Robinson , Laura Foy and Kristi Carr
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Shering Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Dorothy Robinson
as 10-2832
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DOROTHY ROBINSON, a/k/a "Mae-Mae" a/k/a Dorothy Johnson
ROBINSON et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv80701
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE COMPANY, A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROY THOMAS ROBINSON and DOROTHY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Dorothy Robinson
as 09-2439
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DOROTHY ROBINSON, AKA Mae-Mae, AKA Dorothy Johnson
Daniels v. Cobb Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2008cv03863
Petitioner:
Gail V. Daniels
Respondent:
Cobb Judicial Circuit, Dorothy Robinson, John Hilderbrand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
