Cases 31 - 40 of 244
Asaro et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv10460
Plaintiff:
Paulette Hasson, Lee Gargano, Barbara Duffy and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Duffy v. Lidl US, LLC
as 1:2020cv03578
Defendant:
Lidl US, LLC
Plaintiff:
Deborah Duffy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ates v. Azrack et al
as 2:2020cv03590
Defendant:
Mark C. Dillon, Linda Christopher, Ruth C. Balkin and others
Plaintiff:
Murat Ates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duffy v. Saul
as 1:2020cv05383
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration (SSA) and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Davon M. Duffy and Davon Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Kirschner et al v. Kimmel et al
as 1:2020cv04287
Defendant:
KBC EQUITY FUND STRATEGIC SATELLITES, SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLP, GREGORY CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
MARC S. KIRCHNER, WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB and Mark S. Kirschner
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv03212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Principality of Monaco v. Berg and Duffy, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv03188
Plaintiff:
PRINCIPALITY OF MONACO
Defendant:
JAMES P. DUFFY, III and BERG AND DUFFY, LLP
Ates v. Altiner et al
as 2:2020cv01477
Defendant:
Paul B. Harding, Mark C. Dillion, Linda Christopher and others
Plaintiff:
Murat Ates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valerio v. Anfield Interiors, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02275
Plaintiff:
Valerio and Roberto Arias Valerio
Defendant:
Anfield Interiors, Inc, Ruairi K. Duffy and Anfield Interiors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
