Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Crow Eagle v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 4:2012cv04069
Plaintiff:
Gilbert D. Crow Eagle
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Paul Schorder, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow Eagle v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 3:2012cv03012
Plaintiff:
Gilbert O. Crow Eagle
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Paul Schorder, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Two Eagle v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04014
Plaintiff:
Lynn Two Eagle
Defendant:
Douglas Weber, Cliff Fantroy, Troy Ponto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks et al v. Gant et al
as 5:2012cv05003
Plaintiff:
Chris Brooks , Francis Rencountre , Gloria Red Eagle and others
Defendant:
Jason Gant , Shannon County, South Dakota , Fall River County, South Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walking Eagle v. United States of America
as 5:2011cv05016
Petitioner:
Kevin Walking Eagle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Holy Eagle v. Riesch et al
as 4:2010cv04172
Plaintiff:
Clement Holy Eagle
Defendant:
Tim Riesch, Bob Dooley and Doug Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Two Eagle v. Weber
as 5:2010cv05035
Petitioner:
Lynn Joseph Two Eagle
Respondent:
Douglas Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Crow Eagle et al
as 3:2010cv03004
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Iverene D. Crow Eagle and Rosebud Sioux Tribe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Eagle Thunder v USA
as 3:2010cv03001
Petitioner:
Herbert J. Eagle Thunder
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
v. United States of America
as 5:2009cv05086
Plaintiff:
John Michael Jumping Eagle
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
