Cases 31 - 40 of 194
EARLS/ALLRED et al v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv00011
In Re:
SUING CLINTON CO., MADISON CO., AND THE CITY OF ANDERSON
Petitioner:
JACKIE DELEANA-ANGELIN EARLS/ALLRED
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DICKERSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06558
Plaintiff:
EARL E. DICKERSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKARD v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02133
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY EARL AKARD
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DICK BROWN, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earls v. USA
as 2:2021cv00221
Petitioner:
Fairly W Earls
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Post v. Neal et al
as 1:2021cv00231
Defendant:
Anthony Neal, Ron Neal, Gregory Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Earl Post
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Post v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Anthony Neal, Ron Neal, Gregory Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Earl Post
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STREETMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01266
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MACKIE EARL STREETMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON et al v. GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2021cv00393
Plaintiff:
EARL DIXON, E. D., IV and E. D.
Defendant:
GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY doing business as TRUSTGARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kronk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
David E. Kronk and David Earl Kronk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
