Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01942
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Feeley v. Earl et al
as 3:2017cv00649
Defendant:
Allan R. Earl, William Kephart and A. Randall Thoman
Plaintiff:
Aaron Scott Feeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bailey v. Frantz et al
as 3:2016cv01917
Petitioner:
Edward Earl Bailey
Respondent:
Board of Parole, Judge Frantz, Sandra Rorick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walton v. Myrick et al
as 2:2016cv01548
Defendant:
M. Brandt, James Deacon, John M. Myrick and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Earl Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. City of Burns Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv01311
Defendant:
All Oregon State Patrol Officers, All law enforment officers in Oregon, Bend Police Redmond Police & Oregon State Patrols and Police Chiefs in Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Donnie Earl Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cohens v. USA
as 3:2016cv01227
Petitioner:
David Earl Cohens
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brink v. USA
as 3:2016cv01171
Petitioner:
Kenneth Earl Brink
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Noble v. USA
as 6:2016cv01133
Petitioner:
Benjamin Earl Noble
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Baum v. Columbia County, et al
as 3:2016cv00597
Plaintiff:
Jane Baum
Defendant:
Columbia County, Jeffrey Dickerson, Earl Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
