Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Chase et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2011cv00600
Plaintiff:
Timothy Chase and Kimberly Chase
Defendant:
United States of America, Keith Edmond and Erie Insurance
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Shirazi v. Peninsula Internal Medicine LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00656
Plaintiff:
Mahmaud Shirazi
Defendant:
Peninsula Internal Medicine LLC, 31575 Winterplace Parkway LLC, Candy Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv02957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
MACHIE v. MANGER et al
as 8:2009cv02196
Plaintiff:
EDMOND K. MACHIE
Defendant:
J. Thomas Manger, NANCY DEMME, PAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv03321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edmonds v. Astrue
as 8:2008cv02040
Plaintiff:
Monte Edmonds
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Edmonds v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv01499
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Edmonds
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Edmond et al v. Maher et al
as 8:2007cv02883
Plaintiff:
John Edmond and Pamela Lyles
Defendant:
Edward Maher, Judy Nigh and Snowden Chase Realty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edmond et al v. State Of Maryland et al
as 8:2007cv02615
Plaintiff:
John Edmond and Pamela Lyles
Defendant:
State Of Maryland and Prince George's County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Edmond et al v. State Of Maryland et al
as 8:2007cv02145
Plaintiff:
John Edmond and Pamela Lyles
Defendant:
State Of Maryland and Prince George's County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
