Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Jenkins v. Shirley et al
as 5:2014cv02711
Plaintiff:
Bobby C Jenkins
Defendant:
Brian Shirley, Dr McRee, Dr Zubel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. Merchant et al
as 1:2013cv02721
Plaintiff:
Trovon Keith
Defendant:
Nancy C Merchant, Tamara Conwell, Maria Leggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harley v. Ward et al
as 0:2013cv02350
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harley
Defendant:
Robert Ward, Larry Cartledge, Alw Claytar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Cartledge et al
as 9:2013cv01912
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M Arnold
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney, Mrs Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Ley et al
as 6:2013cv01589
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
John Ley, N Chandler, K Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Samples v. Tamarchio et al
as 1:2013cv00657
Plaintiff:
Forrest Kelly Samples
Defendant:
John Tamarchio, Mathew L Harper, Katherine Watson-Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03322
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hines v. Robinson et al
as 6:2012cv01834
Plaintiff:
Willie Junior Hines
Defendant:
Chad Robinson, Adetoro Sobowale, Amy Enloe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2012cv01847
Plaintiff:
David J Kennedy
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Victoria O Balogun , Katherine W Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Blakely v. Moore et al
as 5:2012cv01214
Plaintiff:
James G Blakely
Defendant:
Dr Moore, Nurse Enloe, M McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
