Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Maurice Hunt v. Matevousian, et al
as 17-15504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
MANTEVOUSIAN, SNIDER, Associate Warden, GARCIA, Facility Captain and others
Maurice Hunt v. Warden, et al
as 16-16639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, Complex Warden, L. SHULTZ, Associate Warden, MILLER, Associate Warden and others
Maurice Hunt v. USDC-CAFR
as 16-73092
:
In re: MAURICE HUNT
Petitioner:
MAURICE HUNT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
MATEVOUSIAN, SNIDER, Associate Warden, GARCIA, Facility Captain and others
Matthew Powell v. M. Barron, et al
as 16-16620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW LAMONT POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
M. BARRON, Correctional Officer @ CSP-Corcoran, R. GOINGS, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, I. RIVERA and others
Barger v. CDCR et al
as 2:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
Sonny Barger, II
Defendant:
CDCR, Gunner and Facility Captain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barger v. CDCR et al
as 3:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
Sonny Barger, II
Defendant:
CDCR, Gunner and Facility Captain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duwaine Reese v. K. Robinson et al
as 2:2015cv05939
Defendant:
Does, Does, Facility Captain M. Nunez and others
Plaintiff:
Duwaine Reese
Barger v. CDCR et al
as 2:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
Gary Dale Barger
Defendant:
CDCR, Supervisor Trust Office, Rackley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Alexandre Pinkston v. Facility Captain Sean Moore et al
as 2:2015cv00270
Defendant:
Sergeant R Franklin, Lieutenant E Gaffney, Facility Captain E Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Michael Alexandre Pinkston
Barger v. Director of OPS of CDCR
as 3:2014cv05459
Plaintiff:
Gary Barger
Defendant:
Director of OPS of CDCR, Supervisor Trust Office, Rackley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
