Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Holder v. Cuyahoga County Jail, et al.,
as 1:2016cv02718
Plaintiff:
James De'Andre Holder, III
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Jail, Clifford Pinkney, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Mohr et al
as 1:2015cv01588
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Director Mohr and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Easley v. Judd et al
as 1:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Defendant:
Dana Judd, Donald Morgan, Kathy Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosset Company, LLC v. Reading Food Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Crosset Company, LLC
Defendant:
Reading Food Services, Inc., Goessling Enterprises, LLC and Stephen Goessling
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01811
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Champion Foodservice, LLC v. Vista Food Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01195
Plaintiff:
Champion Foodservice, LLC
Defendant:
Vista Food Exchange, Inc. , Joshua Newman , Innovative Food Service, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Weaver v. Ovations Food Services, LP et al
as 1:2012cv00200
Plaintiff:
Nadine Weaver
Defendant:
Ovations Food Services, LP and Comcast-Spectator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles E. Payne v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00831
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Payne
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Warden Cooper, Curtis Wingard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Midland Food Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01343
Plaintiff:
Ryan Palmer
Defendant:
Midland Food Services, Inc. and Pizza Hut, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
