Cases 31 - 40 of 54
United States of America v. Bautista
as 6:2015cv03311
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Francisco Bautista
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246
BITCO General Insurance v. Heartland Midwest LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00384
Plaintiff:
BITCO General Insurance
Defendant:
Heartland Midwest LLC, Time Warner Cable Midwest LLC, Michael Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Turner v. Pryor et al
as 2:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Terry M. Turner
Defendant:
Thomas Pryor, Kendis F. Archer, Milo Farnham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tobar et al v. Republic Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01776
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Tobar and Francisco Tobar
Defendant:
Republic Services, Inc. , Allied Services, LLC and Bridgeton Landfill, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez-Jasso v. USA
as 4:2014cv00492
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Francisco Sanchez-Jasso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santana v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00090
Petitioner:
Francisco Santana
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lay et al v. The San Francisco Association et al
as 4:2013cv01080
Defendant:
The San Francisco Association , Curry Association Management, Inc. , Charles F. Curry Real Estate Company and others
Plaintiff:
Howard D. Lay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laura Blankenship v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 4:2013cv01087
Plaintiff:
Laura Blankenship
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. , Medtronic Vertelink Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santana v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00200
Petitioner:
Francisco Santana
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ruedas v. Douglas et al
as 6:2012cv03345
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Ruedas
Defendant:
Dustin Douglas, Dan Wagner and Michael Bowersox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
