Cases 31 - 40 of 218
Tommiel Claiborne v. Frank Shaw
as 19-60189
Petitioner / Appellant:
TOMMIEL CLAIBORNE
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK SHAW, Warden, East Mississippi Correctional Facility
James Ferguson v. Bradley Ellis, et al
as 19-60165
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT ALMA WREN, OFFICER BRADLEY ELLIS, TONY DONALD, Unit #5 Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES FERGUSON
Powell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2019cv00023
Defendant:
Mary Ann Jones, Charlis Dukes, Ruth Saucier and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Reeves v. Shaw
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Frank Shaw
Plaintiff:
Edmond Denton Reeves
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. Shaw et al
as 3:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Jane Does, Warden Frank Shaw, Sgt Unknown D. Chapman and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Anthony Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Shaw
as 1:2018cv00355
Plaintiff:
George Lee Parks
Defendant:
Frank Shaw
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McMullen v. Hall et al
as 3:2018cv00838
Defendant:
Frank Shaw and Pelicia Hall
Plaintiff:
Steven McMullen
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Shaw
as 2:2018cv00196
Defendant:
Frank Shaw
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lee Bradley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carey v. Shaw et al
as 3:2018cv00673
Defendant:
DHO Investigator Dept., Unknown D. Chapman and Warden Frank Shaw
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Donald Carey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00533
Defendant:
Centurion of Mississippi, Inc., Unknown Nagel, Norris Hogans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jason Bruce Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
