Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Ingram v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 2:2012cv01787
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Pep Boys, Geico Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2012cv01731
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Geico Casualty Company, Safe Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 2:2012cv01557
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Geico Casualty Company, Mercury Insurance Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2012cv01523
Defendant:
City of Sacramento , Pep Boys, Geico Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing L.P. v. Comcast Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv06996
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing L.P. and Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing L.P.
Defendant:
Comcast Corporation, Comcast Corporation, Comcast Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation
as 2:2007ml01816
Defendant:
Carolina Power & Light Company, Citizens Communications, Time Warner Cable Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Ronald Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc., Xerox Global Services Inc and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation, Intervoice Inc and Aspect Communications Corporation
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Macy's Inc, Bloomingdale's Inc, FDS Bank and others
Counter Claimant:
21st Century Casualty Company, Randall's Food Markets Inc, DIRECTV Holding, LLC and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn and Bernard H Chao
Petitioner:
Target Corporation, Target Bank, Robert Cohn and others
Cross Defendant:
International Business Machines Corp
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
