Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Dwight Freeman v. Terry Collins, et al
as 13-3482
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DWIGHT FREEMAN
Defendant:
TERRY COLLINS, Director, GARY CROFT, Warden, MS. MILLER, Dr. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LIEUTENANT KAUT and CORRECTION OFFICER HAYES
Harris v. Nink et al
as 2:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Harris
Defendant:
Carl Nink, John/or Jane Doe, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chasteen v. Mack et al
as 3:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Adam Chasteen
Defendant:
Lawrence Mack, Rudolph Divins, Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Roberts v. Gary Croft, et al
as 12-4106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY CROFT, ROB JEFFREYS, Warden, TERRY TIBBALS, Warden and others
Snead et al v. Mohr et al
as 2:2012cv00739
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Snead and Kevin D. Darrah
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Krisher, Gary Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Brown, Jr. v. D. Timmerman-Cooper, et al
as 12-3959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK C. BROWN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. TIMMERMAN-COOPER, Warden, BRIAN COOK, Warden and GARY CROFT, Chief Inspector
Brown v. Mohr et al
as 2:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Steven S. Brown
Defendant:
Director Mohr, Austin Stout, Greg Trout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mohr et al
as 1:2012cv00583
Plaintiff:
Steven S. Brown
Defendant:
Director Mohr, Mary Anne Reese, Austin Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cockshutt v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction et al
as 2:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
John D Cockshutt
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, Ernie Moore, Warden Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Rose
as 1:2012cv01509
Plaintiff:
Duane Gibson
Defendant:
Kelly Rose , Mr. Roque , Mr. Bulter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
