Cases 31 - 37 of 37
GIRARD ESTATE AREA RESIDENTS et al v. DEFENSE REALTY, LLC
as 2:2008cv02456
Plaintiff:
GIRARD ESTATE AREA RESIDENTS, GIRARD ESTATE AREA RESIDENTS, BROAD STREET WEST CIVIC ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
DEFENSE REALTY, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WEST v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2008cv00482
Petitioner:
GIRARD WEST
Respondent:
MELVIN LOCKETT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIRARD v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00705
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. GIRARD
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GIRARD v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv70352
Plaintiff:
LEO R. GIRARD and LEO R. GIRARD
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEVY et al v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
as 2:2007cv69232
Plaintiff:
JO ANN ALGIERS LEVY, JO ANN ALGIERS LEVY, JAMES ALLPHIN and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GIRARD v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv03604
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. GIRARD
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
TRYON v. ACCUDYNE ENGINEERING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv00201
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN TRYON
Defendant:
ACCUDYNE ENGINEERING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, ACCUDYNE ENGINEERING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, SMS EUMUCO GmbH and others
Cross Claimant:
ACCUDYNE ENGINEERING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, ACCUDYNE ENGINEERING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY and SMS EUMUCO GmbH
Cross Defendant:
SMS EUMUCO GmbH, GIRARD ASSOCIATES INC., GIRARD ENGINEERING INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
