Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00589
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00517
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00747
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
GOLDSMITH v. FLINTKOTE et al
as 2:2010cv79820
Plaintiff:
SIMMIE GOLDSMITH
Defendant:
FLINTKOTE, H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOLDSMITH v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79817
Plaintiff:
PAUL GOLDSMITH, SR.
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., KEENE CORPORATION, NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOLDSMITH v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79818
Plaintiff:
PAUL GOLDSMITH, JR.
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., KEENE CORPORATION, NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOLDSMITH et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02136
Plaintiff:
LINDA GOLDSMITH and STEVEN GOLDSMITH
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BILL GOLDSMITH PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. PHOTO COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
as 2:2010cv00513
Plaintiff:
BILL GOLDSMITH PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
PHOTO COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CARTER v. WALKER et al
as 5:2009cv04912
Petitioner:
BOOKER LEON CARTER
Respondent:
CRYSTAL WALKER, JAMES TIMOTHY GOLDSMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
