Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Smith v. Grays Harbor County, et al
as 3:2014cv05443
Plaintiff:
Matthew Eric Smith
Defendant:
Grays Harbor County , Powell , Jake Stien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Burnett et al
as 3:2014cv05087
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Holcomb
Defendant:
Charles Burnett, Jennifer Minkler, Grays Harbor County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Grays Harbor County
as 3:2012cv05400
Petitioner:
Dan SA Holcomb
Respondent:
Grays Harbor County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henry v. Atoch et al
as 3:2011cv05740
Plaintiff:
William F. Henry
Defendant:
Brandon Atoch , City of Oakville , Grays Harbor County and others
Counter_claimant:
City of Oakville
Counter_defendant:
William F. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Searls v. Grays Harbor County et al
as 3:2011cv05673
Plaintiff:
Marcus R Searls
Defendant:
Grays Harbor County, Oakville City of , Elma City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Chinn v. Blankenship et al
as 3:2009cv05119
Plaintiff:
Philip Chinn
Defendant:
Benjamin Blankenship, Jane Doe Blankenship, Richard C Pigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hartford et al v. Grays Harbor County et al
as 3:2007cv05633
Plaintiff:
Duane Hartford, Elaine Hartford and John Latch
Defendant:
Grays Harbor County and Sierra Pacific Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fruto v. Grays Harbor County PUD #1 et al
as 3:2007cv05584
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fruto
Defendant:
Grays Harbor County PUD #1 and Dennis Waldron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
