Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Penn III v. Cottrell et al
as 1:2019cv02741
Defendant:
Howard Fischer, Karen E. Willenken, James E. Grimes and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Penn III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Washington et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv12306
Defendant:
Ryan Lawson, Matthew Labombard, Frank Foe Shield #323 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Espinal, John Doe, Pariis Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albrecht et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11431
Plaintiff:
Zia Ziprin, Felix Rene Meier, Chenenne Guevarra Francis and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Synergistic International LLC d/b/a Glass Doctor v. Stacy et al
as 2:2019cv00296
Defendant:
Sean Grimes and Abrams Stacy
Plaintiff:
Synergistic International LLC d/b/a Glass Doctor
Escowitz v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11713
Plaintiff:
Steven Gardener, Dawn-Marie McComb-Giuffre, Greg Gerkens and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Brown et al v. New York City Housing Authority
as 1:2016cv09263
Plaintiff:
Brown, Brian Brown, Nicholas Sciarrino and others
Defendant:
New York City Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grimes et al v. Hallock
as 2:2018cv02311
Defendant:
Susan Hallock
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Grimes and Brenda Grimes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grimes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv01302
Plaintiff:
Charles Grimes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
