Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 71
In re: Eric Goering
as 16-4221
Petitioner: In re: ERIC W. GOERING, Assignee of Waite, Schneider, Bayles & Chesley Co., LPA, pursuant to In Re: Waite, Schneider, Baylelss & Chesley Co., LPA, Case No., 2016003659 in the Hamilton County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division
Nancy Roell v. Ham. Cty. OH Bd of Cty Comm., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4045
Plaintiff - Appellant: NANCY ROELL, as executrix of the estate of Gary L. Roell, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee: HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, JIM NEIL, In his official capacity as the Hamilton County Sheriff, JOSEPH HUDDLESTON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as an employee of Hamilton County and others
Bradley v. Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00798
Defendant: Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services , Hamilton County, Ohio , Greg Hartmann and others
Plaintiff: Desena Bradley
Cross_claimant: Chris Monzel , Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services , Todd Portune and others
Cross_defendant: Glen Bates and Andrea Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Harmon, et al v. Hamilton County, Ohio, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-4125
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN HARMON and STEPHANIE HARMON
Defendant: HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SHERIFF, HAMILTON COUNTY and others
Defendant - Appellant: SHAWN COX, RYAN WOLF, MATTHEW WISSEL and others
John Harmon, et al v. Hamilton County, Ohio, et al
as 15-4117
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN HARMON and STEPHANIE HARMON
Defendant: HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SHERIFF, HAMILTON COUNTY and others
Defendant - Appellant: RYAN WOLF, MATTHEW WISSEL, JOHN HAYNES, Patrol Officers, In their Official and Individual Capacities and others
Pettus-Brown v. Cooper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00539
Plaintiff: LaShawn R. Pettus-Brown
Defendant: Ethna M. Cooper , Joseph T. Deters , Jim Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ohio Council 8 Amer Fedn, et al v. Secretary of State, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3678
Plaintiff - Appellant: OHIO COUNCIL 8 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, HONORABLE NADINE ALLEN, HONORABLE PETER J. CORRIGAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY OF STATE JENNIFER BRUNNER, In her official capacity as Secretary of State of Ohio, BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO and others
Laurie Range, et al v. Kenneth Douglas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4192
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: LAURIE RANGE, DONNA R. GUTRIDGE, LINDA M. SEARS and others
Defendant: KENNETH DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: BERNARD KERSKER, Individually and in his official capacity as an employee of Hamilton County, Ohio, FRANK CLEVELAND and HAMILTON COUNTY/BOARD OF HAMILTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Daniel Haller v. Thomas Lipps, et al
as 12-4161
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL HALLER
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS LIPPS, Individually and in his official capacity as an employee of Hamilton County, Ohio, DENIS HOLTMEIER, Individually and in his official capacity as an employee of Hamilton County, Ohio, RALPH WINKLER, Individually and in his official capacity as an employee of Hamilton County, Ohio and others
Laurie Range, et al v. Kenneth Douglas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3857
Plaintiff - Appellee: LAURIE RANGE
Defendant: KENNETH DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellant: BERNARD KERSKER, Individually and in his official capacity as an employee of Hamilton County, Ohio, FRANK CLEVELAND and HAMILTON COUNTY/BOARD OF HAMILTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?