Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Hardy-Mahoney v. Prime Healthcare Services d/b/a Saint Mary's Regional Medical Center, Reno
as 3:2017cv00216
Petitioner:
Valerie Hardy-Mahoney
Respondent:
Prime Healthcare Services d/b/a Saint Mary's Regional Medical Center, Reno
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Hughes v. Goedert et al
as 3:2017cv00174
Defendant:
Warren G. Goedert, Delmar L. Hardy and Joan C Wright
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Hardy v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv02585
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Hardy
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jackson v. North Las Vegas Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00803
Defendant:
All of the former City of North Las Vegas City Council Under Shari Bucks, Shari Bucks, Chronister and others
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00694
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00513
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Arpino v. Baca et al
as 3:2014cv00034
Petitioner:
John Francis Arpino
Respondent:
Isidro Baca, Patrick Flanagan, David A. Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aldridge
as 3:2013cv00533
Petitioner:
Ernest Charles Aldridge
Defendant:
James Cox, Joe Digesti, Tom Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
