Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Brisco Bey v. Holder et al
as 4:2009cv02084
Petitioner:
Clarence E. Brisco Bey
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley G. Lappin and T.R. Sneizek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Milhouse v. Bledsoe et al
as 1:2009cv01953
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Defendant:
B.A. Bledsoe, C. Miorana, J. Adami and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burnette v. Lappin
as 3:2009cv01192
Plaintiff:
Solomon E. Burnette
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HICKS v. YOST et al
as 3:2009cv00123
Petitioner:
CLARENCE HICKS
Respondent:
JOHN YOST, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jeffries v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Vernell A. Jeffries
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Scott Dodroll, B.A. Blesdoe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SIMMONS v. YOST, et al
as 3:2009cv00036
Plaintiff:
ALAN SIMMONS
Defendant:
JOHN YOST, JOHN DODRILL, MARK MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Simmons v. Yost et al
as 3:2008cv02325
Plaintiff:
Alan Simmons
Defendant:
John Yost, John Dodrill, Mark Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TINLENBERG v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2008cv01385
Plaintiff:
JASON LOUIS TINLENBERG
Defendant:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, FRANCISO QUINTANA, S. L. NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brito v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 3:2008cv01673
Plaintiff:
Ramon Brito
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice, Michael B. Mukasey, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ramirez v. Martinez et al
as 4:2008cv01034
Petitioner:
Carlos Ramirez
Respondent:
Jerry Martinez, Douglas Sabin, Scott Blake and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
